Representing Texas Homeowners Associations & those aggrieved by them

Attorney Trey Wilson handles lawsuits and pre-litigation disputes involving enforcement of restrictive covenants/deed restrictions, Homeowner Association member voting/ballot/proxy issues, HOA Board elections, collection of assessments/dues, placement and removal of liens, CCR/Declaration disputes, developer HOA control/turnover, ACC approval, HOA Board governance, Abuses by Homeowners Associations and drafting/amendment of HOA documents including By-laws.



Showing posts with label San Antonio Real Estate Attorney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label San Antonio Real Estate Attorney. Show all posts

1.15.2014

Rising community association fees are squeezing homeowners on tight budgets

San Antonio HOA Lawyer Trey Wilson wrote: From the Washington Post:
By Tara Bahrampour, Published: January 11


When Brenda Batts purchased her condominium near the U Street corridor in 2006, she was planning to retire at age 65. Now 62, Batts, an office manager, fears she may not meet that goal, thanks to a nagging worry from when she purchased the unit, which assesses a monthly fee for common charges on top of her mortgage and property taxes.
“As I was filling out the papers, an annoying thought was, ‘Oh my gracious, one day your condo fees may be higher than your mortgage,’ ” said Batts, who qualified for affordable housing, allowing her to pay about half the market rate, which was then $428,000, for her one-bedroom unit.

That day is approaching faster than she expected. Her monthly fee, $166 when she moved in, has more than doubled to $371, and a special assessment for building expenses a couple of years ago cost her an additional $583. Now, with no telling how much more the fees will rise, she wonders whether she can afford to retire on schedule.
Fees associated with condos, co-ops and homeowners associations range widely, from $50 per year to thousands of dollars per month, and they often rise with inflation. But sometimes they rise more quickly, and for owners with tight budgets, the hikes can be overwhelming.
“With a condo, it’s not like a single-family house where you’re done paying your mortgage and all you have left to pay is your property taxes,” said Sarah Scruggs, director of advocacy and outreach at Manna, a nonprofit housing corporation in the District.
“In D.C., this has been a huge issue,” she said, adding that owners who qualify for lower-priced affordable-housing units in mixed-rate developments generally pay the same level of fees as market-rate owners.
“There’s nothing in the laws that says fees for an affordable resident have to be capped,” she said. “So they’re at the whim of the condo association.”
D.C. Council member Muriel Bowser (D-Ward 4) said constituents have raised the issue so much over the past couple of years that she is considering introducing legislation to address it.
“One idea that I’m exploring is to have a mediation program that would require face-to-face mediation before any action could go against a condo owner,” said Bowser, who is running to be the District’s mayor. “We really want to make sure that people don’t get priced out of their units, but we also want to make it possible for condos to be able to operate.”
In the past four decades, the number of condominiums, co-op units and houses that are part of homeowners associations has skyrocketed across the nation, from 701,000 in 1970 to 25.9 million in 2012, according to the Foundation for Community Association Research.
The foundation does not categorize ownership by age, but an analysis by AARP’s Public Policy Institute in 2003 found that 46 percent of owners in single-family homeowners associations were older than 50, as were 56 percent of condo and co-op owners.
For homeowners who are retirees or who plan to retire soon, the fee hikes can be particularly onerous, said Rodney Harrell, a senior adviser at the institute.
Adding to the burden, the number of homeowners 50 and older who own their homes free and clear fell between 2000 and 2009, according to an institute report. And in the lowest income group of people 65 and older without mortgages, 58 percent of them were spending at least a third of their income on housing.
That can create a razor-thin margin for survival when a common charge goes up, either in the form of a monthly increase or a one-time special assessment.
“These fees really pile on to these other things that are going on for folks, and because the vast majority of people want to stay in their homes as long as they can, this really becomes the straw that breaks the camel’s back,” Harrell said. “They can put someone into debt and, in the worst-case scenario, lead to foreclosure.”
For people such as Batts who qualify for affordable housing, the fees can potentially create a Catch-22 situation. She bought her condo in the 103-unit building for below market rate; there is a cap on how much she can sell it for, and she must sell it to a buyer at a similar income level. But as the condo fees rise, they may not be affordable for others at her income level.
Moreover, Batts, like most older Americans, would prefer to stay in her home.
“I love where I live — it’s accessible to everything, and I have arthritis in my knees, so I don’t know what I’ll do if the fees in the next 10 years are too much,” she said. “On the one hand, they level the playing field by having these [affordable] units, but on the other hand, if you can’t afford the condo fees and I have to move, then the program is not working.”
Tom Skiba, chief executive of the Community Associations Institute, said the issue of common charges rising too fast for owners “applies to a relatively small percentage of people living in associations, but for those to whom it applies, it’s a serious issue.”
Boards often provide multiple ways for people to pay for special assessments, including letting them pay over time, and low monthly fees can sometimes come back to haunt owners, he said.
“So many boards are under a tremendous amount of pressure” to keep fees low, with some remaining the same for five or 10 years. “That invariably means they’re not putting enough money away in a reserve account to provide for unforeseen situations,” like a boiler or roof needing replacing. “They’re shooting themselves in the foot.”
The challenge, he said, is to find a way for people who are struggling financially to remain in their homes without making their neighbors pick up the slack for building maintenance, snow plowing and other services.
Jack Calman, 66, who owns a unit in a large Silver Spring condominium development, said he has heard a lot of complaints from his neighbors about fees, especially after a special assessment for upgrades, which raised rates by 10 percent for a period of about five years.
“They mostly complain because they don’t come to meetings and they don’t know what the expenses are,” he said, noting that the development needed funds for things like a generator, roof leaks and concrete repairs.
Although he is retired, Calman said he expects to be able to meet his condo costs. “I’ve had a good career, I saved up, and I’m trying to live under Social Security and hope it’s enough.”
As for Batts, if the fees rise too much, she said she may sell the unit to her granddaughter and move to a senior citizens home.
“I would love to shelter in place, but I just don’t know what the future’s going to hold,” she said. “I guess it’s my hope that, God willing, the crick don’t rise, as my great-grandmother used to say.”

12.15.2013

Stone Oak-area HOA Again Loses Bid to Halt Extension of Hardy Oak Road in San Antonio

San Antonio HOA Lawyer Trey Wilson wrote:

The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, has twice ruled against the Sundance at Stone Oak Association, Inc. (the "HOA") in its bid to prevent the extension of Hardy Oak Road across the HOA’s property.  [Author's Note: Hardy Oak Rd. is a major roadway in the Stone Oak master-planned subdivision, which abruptly (and somewhat frustratingly) dead-ends at points between E. Sonterra Blvd. and Knight's Cross, and again between Knight's Cross and Stone Oak Pkwy.].


The trial court had determined that, notwithstanding claims by the HOA that construction was altering the natural drainage patterns of surface waters (which would ultimately render a portion of the HOA property unusable), a 1986 easement filed by the subdivision developer (Sitterle) provided legal authority to build the extension of the road.  The Court of Appeals affirmed this determination, in an appeal filed by the Association on September 21, 2012.

In the lawsuit, the HOA argued that the rights conveyed under the 1986 easement were limited by the documents express terms, and did not allow for construction of a road. Among the HOA's claims were trespass and an unlawful taking of land based on the Hardy Oak Road extension’s construction.
The NEISD contended that Hardy Oak Road was being extended to support the flow of traffic to and from a nearby elementary school, as well as to the surrounding residential areas. The District further argued that the express terms of the Easement authorize construction of the Hardy Oak roadway across the HOA tract and that a roadway easement provides the right for all uses related to the use of a roadway, which necessarily includes the construction of the roadway. 

In its opinion, authored by Justice Alvarez, the Court of Appeals characterized the appeal as "simply a question of interpreting the [1986] Easement and the rights given to each party under it."  After reviewing the easement document's language, the Court held as follows:
Here, the plain language establishes the Sitterle Easement was granted for the purpose of building the Hardy Oaks roadway. The first paragraph of the Sitterle Easement expressly grants “a non-exclusive easement and right-of-way for . . . the 86' roadway known as ‘Hardy Oaks,’” as well as the right to construct underground electric, sewer, and water lines. Additionally, the third paragraph provides the grant is made “until the said easement and right-of-way shall be permanently dedicated by Grantor to the appropriate governing governmental authority and the said roadway known as Hardy Oaks is constructed thereon.” 
We conclude that the Sitterle Easement’s grant of the 86' roadway, and the identified rights of ingress and egress regarding pipes, cables, lines and appurtenances are consistent with the use for “road and street” purposes. See Harris Cnty. Flood Control Dist., 591 S.W.2d at 799. NEISD’s rights therefore include the uses necessary to carry out the purposes of the roadway, including construction of the roadway. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment. 
Hopefully, the ruling will bring some relief to the traffic congestion plaguing Stone Oak! 

6.03.2013

From TMZ -- Justin Bieber's Antics Result in Withheld HOA Dues

JUSTIN BIEBER'S NEIGHBORS

PLANNING REVOLT 

EXCLUSIVE
0602_biebr_tmz_compsite
Justin Bieber's neighbors are fed up with him and are banding together to force the homeowners association in their gated community to do something about the singer's reckless behavior ... by hitting them in the wallet ... TMZ has learned.
Neighborhood sources tell TMZ ... several of the residents of Bieber's Calabasas neighborhood are tired of waiting for their HOA to take action against Bieber ... so they are planning to withhold their monthly dues until something is done.

We're told about 500 residents pay $1,000/month, so it's a huge chunk o' change that could be withheld.

The goal, according to our sources, is to force the HOA to give Justin a stern reminder about the neighborhood rules he's allegedly broken repeatedly -- such as noise during parties (some while Justin was out of town), Justin's friends parking on the street overnight ... and, of course, the speeding.

Any HOA action would be a far cry from Bieber getting arrested or charged by the D.A. -- but we're told the protesting residents will take what they can get at this point.

We called ex-NFL star Keyshawn Johnson to see if he's joined the cause -- since he actually confronted Bieber last week about the speeding -- but haven't heard back yet.


Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2013/06/03/justin-bieber-neighbors-homeowners-association-fees/#ixzz2VDJwCX4m

5.29.2013

Resident and HOA Flagpole Dispute

San Antonio HOA Lawyer Trey Wilson wrote:


As reported by Cindy George of The Houston Advocate,  HOA's and residents of the communities they manage can be disagreeable and destructive.  Ms. George reported that The Forrest Lake Townhouse Association sued homeowner, Billy B. Martin, over a flagpole on a cantilever on his porch.  Houston police had to intervene to resolve the conflict.

Mr. Martin claimed he was targeted by the HOA because of a recent complaint he made about a tattered flag at the clubhouse.  He said that after that incident and after it was replaced, he was told he must remove his flag  or risk a $200 per day fine for attorney and civil damages, because it was "infringing on the common area."  Mr. Martin disagreed with the HOA's assessment and refused to remove the display.  The HOA sought a permanent injunction in December.  At that point, Mr. Martin began displaying his flag upside down in protest.

The lawsuit claims that the pole is "a violation of the general scheme and plan for the development and building in the subdivision," and that his "actions are intentional and/or negligent invasions" into the property owned by the HOA & its members.  The petition also claims that  the display "substantially interferes with their use and enjoyment of the land and it is unreasonable under the circumstances."