9-year-old boy’s fort causes a stir with the neighbors -- Austin

Nicholas Aarsvold, 9, built this wooden play fort between two shrubs on a strip of grass that separates his driveway from his neighbor’s. The Summerwood Homeowners Association wants the structure dismantled because it breaks homeowner rules. Nicholas’ mother, Ramona Aarsvold, is refusing to take it down.

Read the full story in the Austin American Statesman:

9-year-old boy’s fort causes a stir with the neighbors

Covenants Restricting Solar Panels Are Unenforceable in Texas

San Antonio HOA Lawyer Trey Wilson wrote:

Solar energy has been used by humans for thousands of years. Scientists have discovered evidence that Greeks and Romans use burning mirrors to light torches for religious purposes as early as the 3rd century B.C.

In 1977 the U.S. Department of Energy launcheed the Solar Energy Research Institute
“National Renewable Energy Laboratory,” a federal facility dedicated to harnessing power from the sun. Fortunately, San Antonio, and our very own CPS Energy are solar industry leaders.

Yet, despite the historic and modern patterns of embracing solar energy, many restrictive covenants in Texas still expressly prohibit the installation of solar panels on homes and business.

I'll admit, solar panels are ugly.
Solar energy is also a somewhat esoteric topic. But, as our population grows solar energy is becoming an essential alternative to traditional energy sources. Thus, it was time that covenants prohibiting solar energy panels were addressed. That is exactly what happended during the last Texas legislative session.

House Bill 362 was adopted on June 17, 2011, and became effective on that day. The Bill __, and provides, in relevant part:

...a property owners’ association may not include or enforce a provision in a dedicatory instrument that prohibits or restricts a property owner from installing a solar energy device.

As usual, there are certain exceptions, and there is a specific definition of "solar energy device." The effect of the law, however, is clear -- to void a provision violating the general prohibition on CCR provisions that ban the installation of a solar energy device and roofing materials that meet certain criteria.

In my opinion as a lawyer with an active HOA litigation practice, the Legislature got this one right, as this was a law whose time had come!

Commercial Tenants Should Review Restrictions Before Signing Lease

San Antonio HOA Lawyer Trey Wilson wrote:

Restrictive covenants and Property Owners Associations that enforce them are generally associated with residential communities. However, many commercial developments, including strip centers and office complexes have a condominium ownership arrangement. Even where a multi-unit commercial development is owned by a single individual or entity, there usually exist shared "common areas," available for non-exclusive use by all tenants. Frequently, these commercial developments are governed by Restrictive Covenants (or a "Declaration") which limit the types and scope of activities permitted by Owners and Tenants in the development.

Properly-recorded Restrictive Covenants usually "run-with the land" and are applicable even where a Tenant has not been provided a copy. Commercial tenants sometimes enter into leases that expressly authorize them to conduct activities or engage in practices that are prohibited by the applicable covenants. While this situation sometimes arises as the result of unscrupulous acts by a Landlord, most often, the Lessor, himself, is unaware of the language of the Declaration -- especially if the landlord is simply an investor who has never occupied the property. Imagine the surprise of the Tenant who receives notification from the POA or a neighbor that their use of the leased premises is unauthorized and/or expressly prohibited by the Declaration!

To avoid this situation, commercial interests should insist on receiving and reading a copy of all applicable Restrictions PRIOR TO entering a lease, or investing in the build-out of a commercial property. The provisions of a lease will almost NEVER trump valid Restrictive Covenants, and ignorance of the contents of the Covenants is no excuse. To be sure that the intended use is not prohibited, a wise commercial tenant will contact an experienced lawyer to review the terms of the commercial lease, and to identify any prospective problems with applicable restrictions.

Colored Christmas Lights Draw Fine - Video from CNN

WOMAN BATTLES FOR COLORED CHRISTMAS LIGHTS
A woman was fined $400 by her HOA for putting up colored Christmas lights last year, and she's at it again. Watch the video on CNN.

HOA Votes to Ban Smoking

It's not just indoor public places in Eau Claire where lighting up is prohibited. Now residents of a south side, owner-occupied housing complex will have to snuff out smoking in their homes, the most recent sign of public anti-smoking sentiment.

Members of the Fairfax Parkside Homeowners Association on Wednesday voted to outlaw smoking inside residences that are part of the 34-unit development. The ban also prohibits smoking in shared spaces, such as porches and garages, but does allow it in yards and on patios.

Of the 19 association members who voted on the issue, 15 favored the anti-smoking regulation proposed by association President Dave Hanvelt, while four argued that residents should be allowed to smoke in their homes.

"This doesn't restrict a smoker from living here," Hanvelt said of the smoking prohibition. "It just means that there are restrictions on where they can smoke."

Fairfax Parkside is believed to be the first Eau Claire development in which homeowners aren't allowed to light up indoors. "I'm not aware of any other instances where that is the case," said Julie Marlette, coordinator of the Tobacco Free Partnership of Eau Claire County.

The adoption of the indoor anti-smoking rule likely won't impact many Fairfax Parkside homeowners, as Hanvelt said he doesn't know of any smokers in the development. But it does restrict future homeowners there from smoking, and visitors also won't be allowed to smoke inside.

"You don't want to have to worry about your non-smoking neighbor moving out and a smoker moving in," he said.

Hanvelt proposed the regulation earlier this year because homeowners in the development own twin homes, or each side of a duplex-style home. Because of their close proximity, smoke from one unit could flow into the one next door.

"If we all lived in separate units, this wouldn't have been necessary," Hanvelt said, noting homeowners association members made sure to allow outdoor smoking so as to not be too restrictive.

The Fairfax Parkside regulation marks an extension of non-smoking rules from public places to private residences. Last year the Eau Claire City Council approved a controversial ban on smoking in indoor public places, including taverns.

The issue prompted heated response from people on both sides of the issue, and opponents were concerned that the ban could open the door to prohibitions on smoking in people's homes.

Word of the smoking restriction enacted at Fairfax Parkside has some people fuming.
"We worried that this might happen, and now it appears that it has," said Sally Jo Birtzer, a nonsmoker who is president of the Eau Claire City-County Tavern League and general manager of Wagner's Lanes. "As long as tobacco is a legal product, people should be allowed to smoke it in their own homes."

While preventing smoking in privately owned homes is unusual, prohibiting the practice in rental residences isn't unheard of in Eau Claire and elsewhere. Some landlords don't allow renters to smoke indoors in an effort to keep those living quarters cleaner and to reduce the chances of a house fire.

Stomping out smoking in multifamily rental units is a growing trend in other parts of the U.S., Marlette said. "I think people are recognizing the exposure that is occurring to secondhand smoke in multiunit housing," she said. "It is definitely a bona fide health issue, and I think we're going to see more requests for those units to go smoke free."

Dave FitzGerald, one of the Fairfax Parkside developers who also lives there, initially questioned whether the non-smoking measure would hinder future sales in an already tough housing market. But FitzGerald, a nonsmoker, said the anti-smoking rule could attract buyers too, especially given that nearly four of every five people don't smoke.

"Could we lose a sale to somebody who is a smoker? Certainly," FitzGerald said. "But I think there is a better chance of having somebody be willing to live here because there isn't any smoking."

Hanvelt knows firsthand the frustrations of living next to a smoker in a shared-space residence. He previously spent thousands of dollars at a former residence retrofitting his unit to prevent cigarette smoke from a next-door neighbor from making its way to his home, but the effort proved unsuccessful, he said.

Now he looks forward to living in a smoke-free environment. "We adopted this for our own safety and health," Hanvelt said. "This is a very nice place to live, and we want to keep it that way."

from the Eau Clair, WI Leader Times